Third-Person POV: Omniscient vs Limited

Google Image Search

The one issue I have with writing this post is that omniscient is a pain to write.  I get it wrong half the time.  So, I might cut this short to stop getting frustrated.  That and I think it’s fairly straightforward.

Now, I write in a present tense 3rd person style with a limited POV.  I went with limited because it never felt right to have characters or the audience know things that weren’t shown in the book.  I push the boundaries whenever I can when describing new locations, but I really have to use dialogue and discovery to get the facts out.  This includes character thoughts because I always imagine others standing around waiting for inner monologues to end when I picture a scene.  Still, that’s just me and I probably work fast and loose with the rules here.  Might even have it wrong now that I think about it.  It’s another reason why I needed to look a bit more into this.

So, what are omniscient and limited POV?

  • Omniscient is when the narrator knows everything.  They are aware of all events, thoughts, and feelings in a story.  This also means that the audience is aware of all these things as well even if the characters are not.
  • Limited is when the narrator relates only what they are aware of.  They cannot share any thoughts, feelings, and knowledge that they do not have.

Right off the bat, I can see why my own style is going to require a third category later in the post.  Anyway, these POVs work off stable and established narrators even if that role changes by the chapter.  It’s why people don’t like things switching in mid-chapter and get confused on who they are viewing the world through.  After all, POV is the lens that you use to reveal the story.  So, you need it to be clear on who is talking and showing the world even if it’s a faceless/bodiless narrator.

I’m sure most people would agree that one is not better than the other.  With omniscient, you can share a lot and not be restrained by having to holding some things back.  The feelings and thoughts of characters are out there.  With limited, you can’t be as free, but you can easily establish more tension and mystery.  You’re hiding a lot until the right moment and people will understand why it wasn’t shown at the start.  There are different levels of this too, especially since you can be flexible.  Most audiences are only subconsciously aware of POV, so that gives you wiggle room.  Means beta readers are helpful to see if the ‘feel’ is right.

Now, I did find that there is a third category: Limited Omniscience.  This is probably what I use without realizing it.  Part of this is due to the present tense since past tense makes it easier to use the two main POVs.  Now, this one has the narrator experience actions through a character, but not the thoughts and feelings.  You can get that through actions and expressions, but the inner workings of a character are kept hidden until they reveal them.  That is the limited part while the omniscient part is knowing all of the experiences and actions that are going on.  For example, Luke Callindor’s actions in battle are omniscient POV while his feelings and thoughts are predominantly limited until he makes them known.

I really like the combo, but that’s because it’s what I’ve been using for years.  So, I’m rather biased on this.  What do other people think about this topic?  It’s both fairly simplistic and complicated, which makes it hard to write about.  I think it doesn’t help that we all use POV differently even slightly.

Posted in Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Book Trailers: Are They Worth the Effort?

Greetings, SE’ers! Beem Weeks here with you again. Today, I’m discussing book trailers. Are they worth the effort? Book trailers, like so much in the…

Book Trailers: Are They Worth the Effort?
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Author Month: The Hardest Habit to Break

Google Image Search

We were all new authors at some point.  Not that we weren’t writing before for school or other reasons.  It’s just that there was a point where we decided to take the trade seriously and refine our abilities.  Of course, this is usually after we’ve developed some terrible habits that nobody would correct in every day life.  It is funny how we have to be grammatically correct when writing, but not really when speaking.  This is why dialogue can be a nightmare with editing.

I’ve had some doozies in my life.  Overusing the word ‘just’ or ‘only’.  Not knowing any dialogue tags other than ‘says’, ‘asks’, and ‘exclaims’.  Having no idea how to use commas until after college.  All of these pale in comparison to the first habit, which is what led to a major aspect of my style.

In high school, I started trying to write detailed stories.  The problem was that I couldn’t keep a story’s tense straight if my life depended on it.  The meme above is all about me at age 15.  I’d start a sentence with past and end it with present.  Future would show up randomly in a paragraph.  I was all over the map and my writing teacher finally had me stay late after school to have a talk.  This is when I was shown the differences between the tenses and told to pick one.  I went with present because the images I was explaining on the page were going on in my head in real time.  Had no idea present tense stories were so rare. Of course, nobody told me until I published ‘Beginning of a Hero‘.

I still make these mistakes at times, but I’m able to catch it.  So, what was the worst habit you had to overcome as an author?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 24 Comments

One Size Does Not Fit All

Google Image Search

Been thinking about how people tend to give advice.  It’s usually unsolicited stuff, but you get it when you ask too.  Don’t worry because I’ll bring this writing rather quickly.  Just from the title, I’m sure people know where I’m going.  Some probably already jumped to the comments.

Many people give advice in a way that makes it feel like they are giving orders or talking about utter truths.  They believe that because something worked for them, it will work for others.  Maybe they had to go through a tough experience and feel that it’s something everyone should experience.  So, they tell others to do the same and ignore a few basic facts:

  1. Everyone is different.
  2. No experience is completely identical.
  3. People take different lessons from the same event.
  4. Empathy and understanding is needed for good advice.
  5. Don’t get upset if the person doesn’t follow your advice.

#4 is a big one specifically because many people have one, but not the other.  They understand what a person is going through on a logical level, but ignore the emotional side.  Others feel the emotions, but don’t put any logic towards the problem.  This creates a one-sided piece of advice that will either trigger an outburst, make a situation worse, or being ignored and lead to #5.

Personally, I think people do this because they give advice to make themselves feel better and not to help others.  It’s a total ego stroke because you get to be proud and get thanked if you lead someone in the right direction.  Once things go wrong, a person who did it for themselves can become a problem.  They’ll blame the person for not following the advice perfectly, refuse to accept any blame, or just walk away.  In the end, this makes things worse and is why people need to be careful about giving advice.

This brings us to writing where people scream various phrases like they’ve been engraved on the left ass cheek of God.  ‘Show, Don’t Tell!’, ‘Kill Your Babies!’, ‘You NEED a Newsletter!’, and ‘This Marketing Idea HAS to Be Done! are some favorites.  You can see that these pieces of advice fall into two categories:

  • The first two phrases are mottos that people shout without giving any explanation.  It goes this way because many who say them don’t understand them at all.  I’ve had people complain about showing and not telling because they don’t like me using present tense, which changes the way things feel.  Someone once told me that I’m not a real writer unless I kill my babies by deleting 80-90% of what I first write.  These people got angry when I didn’t follow this advice even though it didn’t feel right for what I was doing.  They just used them because they saw it being used by other authors as constructive criticism.
  • The other two phrases are when an author has success with a writing or marketing concept.  They start telling everyone to do it and refuse to believe that it could fail in any way.  Many times I’ve done the same marketing as other authors and come out with nothing while they found success.  Some admitted that what I did was good for my genre or noted there were major obstacles that they didn’t face.  Others put the blame squarely on my shoulders for ‘not doing it right’ or ‘missing the boat’.  The point is that marketing is fickle and what works for one author may be an utter disaster for another.  It makes sense since we’re all individuals with our own styles and play to different audiences.

This is why I always try to say that things worked for me, but it might not work for someone else.  If I ever get around to publishing Do I Need to Use a Dragon? (Fantasy Writing Tips)you’ll see that I make this a big sticking point.  I feel like even the top authors can’t really claim to have all, if any, answers.  For one thing, they got successful during a different era where publishing and reading were different.  People always argue this with me, but you don’t have as many readers as there used to be.  You might think it’s the same, but that’s because you hang out with many readers.  Most of the people I know are too busy to read or stick to non-fiction with no interest in things like fantasy.  You also have readers who go into series only after an adaptation and most of those won’t wander away from that franchise.  It wasn’t like this when older authors were finding success, so some of the advice that is given simply doesn’t work.

So, what can be done if someone asks for advice?  Personally, I think it’s best to give it with the caveat that I mentioned.  Tell them what worked for you and offer more support than words.  Show them what happened and discuss both the pros and cons.  Don’t make things out to be sure bets because they rarely are.  Try to see situations through the eyes of the person you want to help instead of your own.  That will make it clear if your suggestions are even feasible.  For example, don’t suggest dropping hundreds of dollars into marketing to someone who is struggling to buy groceries.  That will come off as insulting and almost elitist because you’re basically saying ‘I am rich enough to succeed and you are not’.  Same goes for free time, support systems, technology, and other aspects that an author might be restricted in for a variety of reasons.

Funny thing is that this post is basically giving advice too.  So, maybe none of it will work for some people.  Weird paradox there.

Posted in Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

WRITERS AND READING

Hi SEers! Denise here to talk about something I do a lot of—reading. I have always been impressed when I run across a beautiful passage that stays …

WRITERS AND READING
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Wombat: No It Doesn’t Have Wings

I vaguely remember learning about the wombat when I was about 5 or 6.  My parents taped a lot of nature shows for me to rewatch and one of them was on Australia.  That was a favorite, so I watched it all the time.  The wombat had maybe a 3-5 minute piece that didn’t go into any details.  Other animals were more interesting, but it was enough that I knew what it was.  So, what is it?

A wombat is a marsupial from Australia and looks like a large rodent.  They are short, four-legged animals that can bowl a person over or bite through a boot.  They are also known to go through fences that happen to be in their way, so they are clearly stronger than they look.  Wombats are burrowers, which is why they have adapted to have a backwards facing pouch.  This means that they don’t get soil in the pouch while digging, so their young are protected from a possible accident.

(Added fact: Read after I published this that wombat burrows are so long and extensive that other animals use them to escape brushfires.  So, they are very important for other species’ survival.)

Wombats eat plants and have a slow metabolism, which helps them survive periods where food is scarce.  One would think they’d be slow like sloths due to their metabolism and you would be right.  Although, they are able to sprint about 25 mph if threatened.  They don’t go very far, but it’s enough to give a predator a challenge.  Wombats are also known for having cube-shaped poop.  This is believed to be an adaptation for marking territory since the shape makes the poop easier to stack.  It is unclear how they form the poop, but it’s thought to be due to the way the intestine moves waste products.

There are 3 species of wombats with the Northern Hairy-Nosed species being listed as critically endangered.  They are one of the rarest land mammals in the world since there are only around 100 left.  Disease, competing for food with cattle and sheep, and predation by wild dogs is what has devastated the Northern Hairy-Nosed wombat population.  It doesn’t help that all three species were labeled as pests and had bounties put on them by the Australian government in the early 1900’s.  That practice has stopped and all of them are now protected in every territory with there being several conservation programs used to help them.  Common (least concerned) and Southern Hairy-Nosed (near threatened) wombats are stable, but the Northern Hairy-Nosed (critically endangered) species is still in a danger.

Let’s look at some pictures and videos to help with visuals.

Common Wombat

Northern Hairy-Nosed Wombat

Southern Hairy-Nosed Wombat

Posted in Animal Posts | Tagged , , , , , , | 34 Comments

Goal Post: Is It Really Saturday?

I’ll admit that I’m thrown off on what day of the week it is.  My son had a 3 day school week while I had a 4 day work week.  He had Tuesday off, but I had to go in for a conference day.  Then, we both had Friday off, which is when I’m writing this since I’m exhausted.  Everything was spinning with all of the end of quarter chaos and the drama caused by certain individuals.  The usual stuff that I can’t go into details with here for yada yada reasons.

I’m not even going to pretend that I expected more out of this week.  The signs were everywhere that it was going to be crazy.  My son had tests, projects, doctor appointments, and chaotic schedule.  He’s attending his first Bar Mitzvah today, which is why I couldn’t even think about doing this post in the morning.  Even removing his responsibilities, I had my hands full.  Work had a lot of juggling on top of training for and during that conference, which I had to race from to get my son to an appointment.  Don’t ask me what happened on what day.  It’s all a blur until I hit Friday.

Friday was a day of laundry . . . Wait . . . No, I actually got to do stuff.  My son and I went to a movie.  Not the one that’s taken up half of the theaters.  We were interested in a really special treat.  That would be ‘One Piece: Red’, which is a movie based around the manga/anime series.  It’s rare that an anime movie will hit theaters, so we were excited to go.  The challenge was that I could only get tickets to the subtitled showing and my son is a slow reader.  He toughed it out and got enough to figure out the plot.  Helped that he already knew all, but one of the characters.  The important thing was getting to see the Strawhat Pirates on the big screen.  Who knows if or when we’ll ever get another opportunity like this?

Writing didn’t get as far as I would have liked.  A big part of that is what went wrong last weekend.  I tried to get as many paperback versions done as I could on Saturday then I was going to leave Sunday for outlining.  I was making okay time getting the formatting right when I got to Legends of Windemere: Family of the Tri-Rune.  It got rejected twice due to cover issues that I couldn’t do anything about.  Obscured lettering and blending into the background, which wasn’t a thing.  Ended up emailing Amazon and submitting once more out of frustration.  Was too miffed to do anything else, so I stopped with 5 paperbacks done.

The galling part is that 48 hours later, I noticed that the book had gone through and Amazon emailed me to say they didn’t see a problem.  They said that what I did must have fixed the issue.  I was honest with them that I didn’t change anything and submitted out of frustration.  They couldn’t quite explain why it was a different result, so we’ll see if this happens with any other books.  I still have 22 to go and I hope to finish them before the end of the year.  I want to use the holiday break at the end of December to start writing Darwin & the Demon Game.  Was that the name I picked out?  Sounds about right.

I mentioned last week that I was going to watch ‘Blockbuster’ on Netflix.  I did that on Sunday instead of writing.  It was okay, but it felt like the bulk of the story could have happened at any setting.  There wasn’t as much about keeping the last store going and mostly about the relationships going on.  Primarily the romantic one while the more interesting things to me were the supporting cast’s antics.  It was a shame because it could have hit a lot of nostalgia.  The only highlight for me was Hollywood Video getting namedropped in episode 9.  That was where I worked back in the day.

I’m currently watching another Netflix show called ‘Lupin’.  It’s French and about a guy who models his life after the gentleman thief character Arsene Lupin.  His father is framed for a crime and commits suicide when he was a child, so he grows up to be a thief who is out for revenge.  It’s pretty good, but I think having no idea about the inspiration is giving me trouble.  Just one episode to go though.

This coming week is going to be more of the same as last week.  Only I get absolutely no days off.  Parent teacher conferences are coming too.  So, I will have to do the same amount of juggling I did before.  This means I’m not going to imagine getting any real writing done.  My plan is to tackle the January posts and then go back to the paperback creations.  That will be next weekend and I’m sure I can get a lot of them done now that I have the rhythm going.  Not very exciting, but the weather sucks and life is keeping me going at a crazy pace.  Only reason I’m still awake while I write this Friday night is because laundry is finishing up.

So, goals of the week?

  1. Help son with schoolwork.
  2. My own work.
  3. Finish the January posts.
  4. Maybe start the February posts if I finish January quickly.  NEED TOPICS!
  5. Finish ‘Lupin’ and maybe start ‘Warrior Nun’.
  6. Get as many paperbacks set up as possible.
  7. Try to use the exercise bike at least once this week.
  8. Sleep better.
Posted in Goal Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Backlash Toward Invulnerable Characters

Superman

Many people hate Superman because of his powers.  The one that gets a lot of attention is his invulnerability because it means he can never be hurt.  People roll their eyes when kryptonite appears and call it a strained plot device.  They argue that it shouldn’t be as common as it seems, which hurts the story even more.  You end up seeing arguments online about how Superman should be able to end a problem within seconds instead of the time period of movie.  It ends up being a feeling that he is overpowered and unrealistic . . . Which is entirely warranted.

The issue here is that an author may have an invulnerable character and not do anything to create tension.  This is weak writing, which turns this powerful being into a hindrance to the overall story.  If done enough, like with Superman, average readers might not pick up on any attempts to circumvent this power.  This is because you have to be cunning in creating weakness without eliminating the invulnerability.  Otherwise, there’s no point in having it in the first place.  So, what can be done?

Let’s use Superman as an example and point out a few things that people may miss:

  1. While he cannot be hurt by most attacks, he can still be held back by an enemy with equal strength.  You can hinder a person without hurting them.  If Superman can’t overpower his enemy and can’t be hurt, he is in a bad position.  That is because he is a protector/guardian type, which means he also holds himself back.  So, his invulnerability keeps him safe, but it doesn’t do the same to those around him.  Best example that people hate is when he killed General Zod, who was about to kill innocent bystanders.  Neither Kryptonian could be hurt and Superman couldn’t overpower his more experienced enemy, so he was forced to kill.
  2. Morality holds heroes back regardless of their powers, including invulnerability.  These are the good guys and typically don’t kill.  Yes, anti-heroes are an exception, but they rarely have Superman-level powers.  This is because many authors try to avoid the abuse of such power and instill a strict moral code.  This is why characters like Superman hold back and depend a lot on being shields.  Push an idea that they are aware that they cannot be hurt, but others can and you can have them be more cautious.  This makes them more human and prone to mistakes.  It’s always made clear that Superman holds back.
  3. Invulnerability has usually been physical like in the case of Superman.  Authors who want to create tension will attack the character on another level.  I don’t mean psychic attacks even though that is fair.  I’m talking about emotional damage.  People see characters like Superman as god-like because of their powers and it’s made worse when the heroes are stoic.  It makes sense for Dr. Manhattan in ‘The Watchmen’ since he lost his humanity, but that was a storyline.  For Superman and similar heroes, he needs that vulnerable heart to counter the backlash caused by having an invulnerable body.  It won’t matter if he can ignore bullets when he left a crying husk because he failed to protect a loved one.  Readers can relate with someone so powerful if they can be brought to tears or enraged by losses that an average person can suffer.  It makes them human in spite of their abilities.

I know I’ll have some arguments in the comments, but that’s what it is.  Superman is a controversial figure at times because of his powers.  Invulnerability is a key component of the criticism, which is why anyone who writes a similar character should consider his history.  There have been versions that made him too powerful and the story suffered immensely.  Others have made him so human that you can forget that he is one of the strongest figures in the DC universe.  So, there is plenty of examples you can find of what to do and what not to do.

Still, the main thing to consider is if you really need to have a hero with this much power, especially invulnerability.  If so then don’t use it so casually.  People will react to how you play it off and look for reasons to care.

Posted in Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

Holidays and the Hemingway Code

Ciao, amici! Today, I’m deviating from my Story Development and Execution series because it’s a special day. In the U.S., it’s Veterans’ Day. The …

Holidays and the Hemingway Code
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Poetry Day: Cry for Some Attention

Midoriya from My Hero Academia

(This poem deals with how the Internet works.  I wrote it when I noticed posting anything positive or a simple update got very little attention.  Once I ranted, I got a flood of comments by people either trying to cheer me up, agreeing, or trying to poke me into a greater fervor.  Hence, crying for attention.)

*****

Again I sit
Staring at the screen
Wondering
What the secret is
And why I’ve yet to find it

I post my poems
My imagination’s blood
Hoping for a comment
Or a statement
To make me feel connected

Instead they sit
Untouched
And unread
Pushed down the page
Buried under fodder

I read what others post
Dinners just eaten
Movies being watched
Pictures changed at whims
Is this what people want?

I see no insight
No bearing of the soul
That attracts a horde of comments
I simply do not see
Why these posts explode

I try my hand
With daily rumbles
Refusing to fall
Into mindless blather
And pointless prattle

Frustration comes ahead
A day of darkness
Pushing me to post
The most heinous thing
The Rant

I rail and scream
For all the world to see
Foaming like a beast
That has been kicked
Letting my rage expend

The comments soar
Without my try
They fall into two camps
Concern from some
Others take offense

The silent friends
Ignorers before this day
Descend like rabid ants
Kicking me
When I am at my worst

I snap back
Growling at their assault
Stopping to wonder
If this perversion of contact
Is really what I want

Posted in Poems | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments