While writing Do I Need to Use a Dragon?, I was wondering about the entire concept of ‘how to’ books.  I went over a lot of this already, but there’s one aspect that I didn’t really touch on.  That is the difference a ‘how to’ vs writing a fiction book.

Why do I think this is something to consider?  I’ve run into many people who talk about the rules of writing.  They make blogs and videos around the topic.  They go on about various aspects of writing and declare their advice.  These people dive into conversations with the air of a professional and stand their ground on their opinions.  Many learn a lot from from them or at least alter their thinking.  There’s just one catch:

Some of these people have never written a book.

It’s a weird type of person to run into.  They are so opinionated and knowledgeable about the aspects of writing that you are sure they’ve at least finished a manuscript.  Instead, they’re spending most of their time reading up on writing and discussing it.  Some will say that they’re still working on their first draft, which is fair.  Others will admit that they haven’t actually written anything, but want to some day.  That’s fair too, but it gets weird when this comes from someone who is giving advice as if they’ve gone through the process yet.  Maybe they hit a comfort zone of learning about writing and they get enough attention being an advisor instead of an author.  Yet, you would think they would at least write a ‘how to’ book.

And that’s where I start to wonder about Do I Need to Use a Dragon? and other books like it.  Now, I’ve written and self-published around 27 books.  So, I’ve put my advice into action.  If it’s a known author who wrote the book then you definitely feel like you’re reading tested advice.  Other times, I found that a person wrote a ‘how to’ book on writing after studying the topic or teaching it on the college level.  There weren’t any signs that they published, but they studied the works of others.  This isn’t bad, but it does mean that the advice comes from a different source.  They’re not showing what they found has worked for them, but noted trends and tricks in others.  So, how could one categorize these?

1. Tested– I’m trying to think of a better word, but I’m stumped.  Basically, this kind of ‘how to’ book would come from someone who has put their advice into practice.  They are talking from personal experience, so there is an intimate knowledge with the material.  You may also have some bias here too.
2. Observational– This type of ‘how to’ is from a person who hasn’t done the activity, but has researched it.  They have picked up on trends and tricks, which they are sharing with readers.  This isn’t to say it is lacking in strength, but it will have a more clinical and distant tone.  It also has less of a chance of personal bias unless the person sticks to a specific author.  These ‘how to’ authors are also more likely to criticize and use examples of what not to do than the previous person.
3. I Read It On the Internet– A third type that I’ve run into a few times.  They haven’t written a book or done any real research.  Many times, this person is someone who wants to write, but never got out of the discussion phase.  They’ll spout whatever they see on the Internet such as ‘show don’t tell’ and ‘kill your babies’.  There won’t be any explanation to those too.  Yet, they’ll see an opportunity to write a book and self-publish it.  This will get them a little money and confidence.

Now, I really don’t have a problem with the first two.  They come at the ‘how to’ book from different angles.  The third one might work if the person is earnest and trying to help, but my experience is that they simply want to get on a soapbox.  Again, personal experience, so there could be some out there who have done their research.  Though, wouldn’t that put them in the second category?

It’s funny writing about this because I genuinely felt like I shouldn’t be writing a ‘how to’ book.  Do I Need to Use a Dragon? was a challenge because I had to write as myself instead of a character.  This resulted in me wondering if my experience as an author was enough to warrant such a book.  I definitely wasn’t in category #3 and didn’t research enough to be in #2.  Yet, there remains a stigma around self-published authors that they aren’t ‘real’ authors.  I still feel that imposter syndrome at times, which is why this book became a bigger challenge.  I had to write with confidence while wondering if I’m worth listening to.  Not a fun juggling act.

So, take a look at my mental meanderings for 99 cents on Amazon Kindle.