This category is why Monday’s post was a little difficult. ‘Life vs Fate Worse Than Death’ makes me think of a person not dying, but being left in a terrible state. Upon reading more about this concept, it appears to be something else since it covers the themes of thriller, horror, and mystery, People die in those, so why do they not fall under ‘Life vs Death’?
From what I can tell, the difference might come down to cause and effect. In an adventure or action story, the heroes typically choose to be in the fray or they at least have some control over their situation. ‘Life vs Fate Worse Than Death’ feels more like the protagonists are dragged into a terrible situation that will kill them. There’s a lot of fear and suffering to break them down. It’s not like when a hero falls. This is when an innocent victim is tortured until they die.
Thriller and horror are what draw me to this conclusion as to how this is different than adventure and action stories. While there is action, the adrenaline is born from fear of a victim instead of fear of a hero. They might both be protagonists, but those in horror and thrillers are made to suffer before they either live or die. A fate worse than death for many could be suffering horribly before dying or simply being murdered in one of the many outlandish ways us authors tend to create. It’s not a natural, simple demise, but one that you can sense came with pure terror in their final moments.
Thriller, horror, and mystery stories involve more trauma as well. If one looks at ‘life’ in this theme as more than physical survival then it shows something much different than adventure tales. What if ‘life’ stands for being psychologically and emotionally intact at the end of the story? Many would say that living with PTSD is a fate worse than death since you’re permanently scarred. Taking this approach, one can see how most survivors of a thriller/horror/mystery story don’t really make it out on the winning side. Yes, they are alive, but the things they have seen will realistically leave them traumatized and suffering for the rest of their lives.
I guess that’s another difference between ‘fate worse than death’ stories and ‘simple death’ ones. The protagonists in adventures tend to be ready to see horrible stuff or at least have the mentality to handle it on some level. They are adventurers or people who step up to the challenge with courage since they have to finish their quest. With thriller and horror protagonists, they tend to be average people from beginning to end. They might be law enforcement, but the don’t come in with powers, magic, or a ton of experience dealing with what they are about to face. In fact, the stronger and more experienced the protagonist of these stories, the more messed up and disturbing the threat. That’s because the intent of the author is to break them either before or instead of killing them.
Can’t be sure if I’ve ever really written one of these stories. I stick to adventure and action tales, so my heroes either start or gain the abilities needed to survive. Maybe the ‘Raven Series’ I put up in October would count since it was my attempt at horror with heroes who weren’t experience with what they were facing. I still put my heroes through the wringer and have some survive with major scars. This means there can be a ton of overlap between certain themes, which is probably a given.
So, what do you think about ‘life vs fate worse than death’ stories?
