Revisit: What Do You Look For In Fictional Pets?

I’m With Snoopy

(Originally posted on September 9, 2013.  We really don’t pay much attention to the pets of heroes unless they overshadow the other characters.  It’s not enough for them to be present and kind of active anymore.  They almost have to carry a bulk of the plot in order to garner proper attention.  I would kind of like a return to more subtlety with the hero pet concept.)

I watch a few Harry Potter movies this weekend while editing since I’ve seen them enough that they’re background noise.  Something caught my attention this time.  The familiars are there, but rarely come into play outside of a few events.  I had the same problem with Stiletto in Beginning of a Hero because it was so difficult to include him in a lot of the action.  As much as Luke Callindor said Stiletto wasn’t a pet, he was an animal that followed a ‘master’ around.  I’m starting to wonder what the true purpose of a pet or animal companion is in a story.

I think many times pets are in there for flavor and a mascot type of thing.  Maybe even marketing various merchandise to animal lovers.  It’s that I see most pets get left behind halfway through stories and forgotten until they are suddenly involved in a grand event.  I see this is typically their death or a brave rescue of their master.  Pets might be more of a ‘out of nowhere’ character because readers tend to forget about them unless they are involved in several scenes or brought up a lot.  Once forgotten, the pet can fade away or make a miraculous return to the reader’s mind.

Personally, I never pay attention to pets without personality.  I use them at times in my stories, but I truly don’t think of them when I’m a reader.  The exception I can think of is Tug the horse from Ranger’s Apprentice.  A reason he stands out is that he has personality, attitude, and is involved in a lot of the events.  He is treated like a main cast character instead of a secondary, which is not common among pet characters.  Still, it’s rather difficult to make a pet a main character.  This is something I’m going to think about and write up for Wednesday’s thought post.  Maybe a fun list of ‘how to use and misuse pet characters’ and throw some humor into it.

So, what do you look for in the pets of characters?  Do you even think of them?

Unknown's avatar

About Charles Yallowitz

Charles E. Yallowitz was born, raised, and educated in New York. Then he spent a few years in Florida, realized his fear of alligators, and moved back to the Empire State. When he isn't working hard on his epic fantasy stories, Charles can be found cooking or going on whatever adventure his son has planned for the day. 'Legends of Windemere' is his first series, but it certainly won't be his last.
This entry was posted in Thoughts and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Revisit: What Do You Look For In Fictional Pets?

  1. noelleg44's avatar noelleg44 says:

    We’re on the same wave length. The minute I saw your question I thought personality and a real role in the story. Garfield, Old Yeller, Misty of Chincoteague.

    Like

  2. Like you I don’t pay attention to pets unless something happens to them.

    Like

  3. I write a ton of pet characters and my readers always seem to love them.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Well, who doesn’t love animals? You can always grab people by the feels with a pet.

    You can humanize an otherwise less interesting supporting character (or a hero who takes themself too seriously). You can have a reason for a character to slow down and breathe. You can introduce comic moments with a pet, or side plots if the pet has their own needs (food, shelter, toys).

    But like everything in the story, the pet has to be there for a reason and should be kept in play throughout.

    Like

Leave a reply to noelleg44 Cancel reply