Teaser Tuesday: Do I Need Supporting Characters?

Yahoo Image Search

Welcome back.  I was surprised to find that this was a question.  So, I had to touch on it and explain supporting characters.  Enjoy.

Do I Need Supporting Characters?

A story can be made or broken by the supporting characters who range from traveling companions to minor villains. Of course, you can have your hero go it alone and have a focus on how someone will carry on when isolated. This is more difficult than one would think because you create a supporting cast as soon as you introduce another character. It might not even be a speaking part. That troll? Supporting character even though it’s a monster. That shop owner selling cheap swords? Supporting even though he only shows up for one scene and has a few simple lines of dialogue. This is a fairly broad definition, but these are all characters who add more color and life to your story. Hence, they should not be ignored entirely.

On the other hand, you don’t have to go deep with these characters if they’re minor and closer to set pieces. Putting hours of thought into a healer who shows up and leaves on the same page is overcompensating. It’s clear they have a purpose, but not enough that the audience needs a full backstory. I would suggest that the amount of time you put into creating supporting characters really should be dependent on how much you are going to use them.

You can divide your cast into three categories to help here:

  1. Primary– This is your main hero and main villain. The story revolves around these characters, so they have to be the deepest. They are the most likely to change throughout the story too. Names, physical description, evolution, backstory, and focus are certainly required more than the other groups. If you are writing an ensemble story, you will have more characters in this category. Never think you can only have 2 characters as primaries if you have multiple heroes and villains who are heavily involved in the plot. That leads to favoritism and the story can be weakened by you reducing the importance of the others while they are truly critical to the events.
  2. Secondary– These are your mentors, independent rivals, allies, third party enemies, and other characters who are important, but not central. They influence the primaries and the story, but they are not the major motivators of the big events. When the battles and adventures hit the high gear, they are standing a few steps back and giving support. They might not be there at all. It helps to have some depth like the primaries including a backstory. Yet, they don’t need a big evolution or one at all because they are distanced enough from the story events. In other words, character development is optional and can be minimal here.
  3. Tertiary– I would put the store owners, key monsters, healers, nobles, and anyone else who shows up for a little time here. They don’t travel beyond their initial area because they serve a single purpose. In a series, you can eventually have them evolve to secondary if they show up more often. If not then you really only need a name, physical description, and a purpose. There’s no evolution here, especially if they’re around solely to be killed.

We are going to be focusing more on the secondary group for, what I think, are obvious reasons. Primary are too essential and tertiary are too temporary. Secondary is where you can find a lot of development catalysts for the characters, story, and world. This is because they aren’t the major movers of events, but influencers of those who will do it. I’d say the men and women behind the curtain if you didn’t see them act. Then again, some supporting characters do stay in the shadows until near the end for a big reveal. That’s a rather niche use though. Beyond the precious plot twist, you get tons of mileage from the secondary cast. I would say more than the primaries in certain areas, which is why it’s important to give these characters more attention than a passing fancy.

About Charles Yallowitz

Charles E. Yallowitz was born, raised, and educated in New York. Then he spent a few years in Florida, realized his fear of alligators, and moved back to the Empire State. When he isn't working hard on his epic fantasy stories, Charles can be found cooking or going on whatever adventure his son has planned for the day. 'Legends of Windemere' is his first series, but it certainly won't be his last.
This entry was posted in Teaser Tuesday and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Teaser Tuesday: Do I Need Supporting Characters?

  1. Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog and commented:
    Here’s another Do I Need to Use a Dragon? (Fantasy Writing Tips) tease from Charles 👍


  2. L. Marie says:

    Great post and tips. Secondary characters often become breakout characters. I think of Fizzle the Drite. I also think of the Avatar episode, “Zuko Alone,” which involved the creation of new characters as you mentioned above.


  3. I agree on the secondary characters. They have to be done well and of course not too well otherwise they become primary. (Which does happen)

    Liked by 2 people

  4. In my experience, the supporting cast will show up whether you want them or not. If you pay attention to your muse, they will add new dimensions to whatever you had planned.


    • They bring depth to the stories. I have met some authors who actively fight to prevent supporting cast from appearing. They have primaries and nameless figures that are either enemies or merchants. Believe their fear was that a supporting character would overshadow their heroes.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. There are stories about solo characters, but they’re usually man against wilderness type tales. Even Tom Hanks needed Wilson. I use my secondary characters to add color all the time.


  6. V.M.Sang says:

    A helpful post, Charles. I have one minor character in Book 1 of my Wolves of Vimar series who disappeared after that book, but has returned in Book 4 to be important.
    In this series, I do have multiple main characters. Sometimes a bit difficult juggling them. It wasn’t my intention at first, but because of their personalities, they all had to have a say.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s