Joan of Arc
Various questions come up when someone wants to write high fantasy and many of them are completely understandable. They may deal with magic, various races, and creating a world that isn’t Earth. Yet, there are other questions that you can see why they are asked, but they come off as shocking. It makes one wonder about the entire genre and how it might not have evolved as much as many believe. I’m going to touch on one of those questions here:
Does a fantasy story have to take place in a medieval Europe/Dark Ages setting?
The obvious answer is ‘No’.
As long as the genre doesn’t require a specific setting type like Westerns and WWII dramas, you can do whatever you want. Even those ‘restrictive’ areas have some wiggle room, so nothing is set in stone. The rules are incredibly flexible with fantasy, which really only requires that there be a magical, mystical element that can’t be chalked up to science. This means you can do the traditional medieval setting or take inspiration from any time period. You can also ignore that and try to make something entirely from scratch. It is much more important to make the world work than to follow what you believe is a genre trend.
It isn’t hard to see why people think it should be medieval worlds or expect them to run the way our history did. Tolkien and Lewis set that standard, which tends to go along without many changes when you look at the big ones. ‘Game of Thrones’, ‘Dungeons & Dragons’, and even series that take place on a future Earth that has magic seem to go for the European aesthetic. Castles with kings and knights traveling in search of adventure or a dragon to rescue from a fire-breathing princess. You’re going to find more series that follow this tradition than blatantly go against it. So, new authors get the feeling that this is a requirement instead of a suggestion that most people take. Although, can you really blame them?
I’ve seen many readers go after a fantasy book because it isn’t historically accurate. A suit of platemail isn’t correct or rules of etiquette don’t meant with medieval standards. You can have a reader complain that the heroes are bathing regularly or that there are indoor bathrooms. Had those tossed my way a few times. As soon as you have the set pieces of medieval Europe, you’re bound to have people assuming that it will be Earth history accurate. This doesn’t make much sense to me when it’s a place like Windemere, which isn’t Earth. Yes, they have settings similar to the traditional, but they also have more modern things like the emergence of indoor plumbing. This means you can’t suddenly say that something isn’t supposed to be that way because it could very well be right since it isn’t Earth.
Well, that’s my opinion and statement on this. I’m going to be playing more with the idea when I finally get to the fantasy tip book. What do you think about the belief that fantasy stories need to be in medieval Europe?
I agree. They can be set anywhere we want. Exploring and creating new worlds are some of the perks when writing.
LikeLike
Probably one of the best perks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely. 🙂
LikeLike
Pingback: Does Fantasy Have to Be Medieval? — Legends of Windemere | The BiaLog
It is an extremely limiting idea… If magic exists in mediaeval Europe, why would it have disappeared today? And in stories set in other worlds or realities, pretty much anything goes. I don;t see why you can’t have cleanliness just because you happen to have dragons 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
The cleanliness one confuses me the most. You’d think the existence magic for healing and cleaning would make the world better than our own.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You would. I would not dream of questioning the rites and habits of a world a writer has created,
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think a lot of people enjoy taking stories and worlds apart instead of indulging in the escapism. They look for logic flaws as if reality makes complete sense.
LikeLike
I’d rather go with a ‘willing suspension of disbelief’ and enjoy the ride 🙂
LikeLike
Me too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah! Now I have an explanation for that in Book 2 of my Elemental Worlds series, The Stones of Fire and Water. In the world of Ignis, or Fire) magic is disappearing because of the development of Science. People are losing belief in magic, so it’s fading.
LikeLike
I doubt it ever fades… but our ability to connect with it may do so.
LikeLike
I enjoy fantasy series of all kinds–medieval or otherwise. Like Sue I don’t see why complaints are made about a made-up world. It’s fantasy!! Why does a fantasy series have to be so “realistic”?
Years ago, I enjoyed how magic and dragons were inserted in books about the Napoleonic era (Naomi Novik’s series and also Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell). Such a fun idea. But I wonder if people complained about them too.
LikeLike
People like complaining. It is weird that fantasy is being pushed to be more realistic. You’d think it would be the genre people would leave alone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, as Pearseus belongs to the sci-fi fantasy subgenre, I obviously agree with you! Indeed, it’s why I love fantasy: it can be part of pretty much any genre. Although you may then call it magical realism, of course.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I like that term. Realistic fantasy is another I’ve heard. That one doesn’t sound right.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Brings “army intelligence” to mind 😉
LikeLike
Magical Realism is its own strange and wonderful thing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And one of my favorite genres 🙂
LikeLike
I love this post. In the general public’s mind fantasy is set in a medieval world. You almost have to be a fanatic reader or an author to understand the variation. I wrote one that was Greco-Roman, and my Lanternfish stuff has gunpowder in it. I wish more readers would take a chance on something that’s a bit beyond their usual thought process.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wish for the same thing. I’m always surprised when somebody responds to my books as if they’re historically inaccurate. It’s not Earth, so why would it’s history be the same?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have fears like that with Lanternfish. I’m trying to do my best with accuracy, but sometimes the fantasy has to move to the forefront.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. Fantasy has to overtake historical accuracy from time to time. Otherwise, the fantastical pieces seem very out of place.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think this one will make a wonderful chapter.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Chris The Story Reading Ape's Blog and commented:
Let Charles know what YOU think, in the comments under his original blog post 😃
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the reblog. Fun comments so far.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw them Charles 👍😃
LikeLike
Fantasy is define as “the faculty or activity of imagining impossible or improbable things”. So, using this definition as your guide, you can understand why many books from a variety of genres can be labelled as fantasy. Ray Bradbury famously said he considered himself a fantasy writer, not a sci-fi writer as many called him:
“First of all, I don’t write science fiction. I’ve only done one science fiction book and that’s Fahrenheit 451, based on reality. Science fiction is a depiction of the real. Fantasy is a depiction of the unreal. So Martian Chronicles is not science fiction, it’s fantasy. It couldn’t happen, you see?.”
And I have to second Sue’s statement about not questioning the rites and habits of a world created by a writer. Many authors write to express in words these worlds they’ve created in their minds. They’re not always based on reality, so I think it’s okay for them to stray from fact for the sake of the story they’d like to tell.
LikeLike
I’ll admit that I differ a bit on Bradbury’s view, but that’s me not liking everything getting tossed into fantasy like it’s a catch all genre. I think fantasy really needs to stray from reality since it involves so many unrealistic things. Yet, it creates its own reality within the boundaries of its world. We spend years crafting the structure of these worlds, which brings them to a solid point. The actions in a story don’t stray from those facts even if they don’t match reality.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that fantasy needs to stray from reality and you’ve really captured the essence of what fantasy is when you say “it creates its own reality within the boundaries of the world” – this is a beautiful way you’ve put it. When I mentioned straying from fact I meant the facts of reality, but I also understand your point about created worlds having facts that maintain their structure, its a very valid point. I think Mr Bradbury was trying to highlight the differences between science fiction and fantasy, and focus attention on the fact that fantasy authors write about things that couldn’t possibly happen: the unreal (just as you’ve mentioned).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Guess this shows facts are what one makes of them in fiction. With Bradbury, I do get what he was trying to say. The tough thing about anything that works with science is that we never really know if it’s truly impossible. With the magic and monsters that tend to be in fantasy, we definitely know those aren’t going to join our real world. I keep thinking about how many things in Star Trek have entered the real world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
☺️ That’s a good point but I guess it goes back to the definition of fantasy: things which are impossible or improbable. Science usually deals with the probable so this is may be why you can distinguish between the two genres.
But I understand there can be times when the line between the two is a little blurred.
LikeLike
Okay. I see what you’re saying. I think it’s the definition of fantasy the mental action that you’re using. The genre has actually been defined as ‘imaginative fiction involving magic and adventure, especially in a setting that is not the real world’. Going by the latter, there is a big difference between it and science fiction. Personally, I hate when the two are combined under one category because they have such big differences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah! I get it! I was looking at the technical definition rather than the genre definition of fantasy. When looking at it from that point of view there is a big difference between the two 😅
LikeLike
Yeah. Though many people use the technical to get their books on Amazon lists.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess it comes down to which definition you agree with the most. I would say they’re both valid, although I lean more towards the technical
LikeLike
And I’m on the opposite end. As you said, they’re both valid and come down to preferences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for this discussion, it’s given me food for thought ☺️
LikeLike
Thank you. I enjoyed it. Made me realize that people may look at fantasy from the other direction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why would someone want Eart History accurate? It is fantasy for heaven’s sake. Time to get out of the comfort zone. good post, Charles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think some people expect fantasy to be a divergence of Earth history from the medieval era. They see the swords and castles, so they think everything else has to be ‘stuck’ in that time period in terms of technology and thoughts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah I think you are right. Does make creativity chancy.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Plaisted Publishing House and commented:
Fantasy Era…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Welcome Charles. You do a lot of interesting posts 🙂
LikeLike
As someone who watched a lot of cartoons in the 1980s, my introduction to fantasy fiction was He-Man and the Masters of the Universe, which had a hero whose strength came from a magic sword, a sorceress in a castle, and an evil wizard with a skull for a face…and also a robot horse, a metal-eating cyborg, and aircraft armed with laser guns. So the idea that all fantasy has to be medieval has always seemed weird to me.
Actually, what’s really unrealistic is the fact that some fantasy worlds somehow STAY medieval (both culturally and technologically) for thousands of years; especially weird in stories that don’t even have magic be common enough or versatile enough to take the place of the technologies that never get developed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It does come off as unbelievable when worlds don’t change. I guess one could argue that the events of Earth that instigated the tech advancements never happened, but you would expect there to be some kind of replacement. I have seen some that pull it off with a reveal that these things existed in an older time and civilization was wiped out. So the tech was lost or banned.
LikeLike
I suspect the medieval fantasy trope comes to a large extent from the fact that the modern ‘fantasy’ story, as it evolved, did so in the western storytelling tradition and harked back to western historical imagery. As you point out, infuse that with Tolkien’s intentional echo of northern mythology, with the D&D derivative mashup of Tolkien, Robert E Howard and medieval storytelling, along with influencers such as Lord Dunsany, and the stage seems to be set for the modern idea. But of course a fantasy story can be set anywhere as long as it’s compelling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. Though there are plenty of eastern fantasy stories. I see some of those tend to go back to a similar time period aesthetic too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The next time someone complains a fantasy is historically inaccurate, tell them “That’s why it’s called Fantasy, not History or Reality.” Personally, I think those who complain about these things are control freaks who want everyone to write the same stories the masters did for decades. That, or they’re just dull and unimaginative. Complaining the characters bathe too much? That is nitpicking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah. There are those who go into a story searching for problems. They enjoy the destruction of it instead of the experience.
LikeLike
If “historical” appears in the genre name, such as with historical fantasy, the setting should be authentic to whatever time period it’s meant to be set in, with only the changes that make it fantasy – such as the addition of magic – being allowed to not be authentic. But it doesn’t need to be medieval. You can have historical fantasy from any time period.
If it’s pure fantasy, in a world created by the author, it doesn’t matter as long as any time the rules for how things work are different is explained, such as areas that might be more advanced technologically or magically than others being mentioned as being that way for whatever reason. I mean, we don’t need area backgrounds totally filled in, but at least make it clear things are meant to be different here. Anyway, whatever time period it mirrors is up to the author, but even if there are similarities in the time period from Earth’s history, if it’s a completely made up world, the main thing is consistancy throughout the book or series, and historical inaccuracies aren’t important. In fact, if it’s a fantasy world, I’d sort of expect there to be something different from Earth, otherwise what’s the point of having it set in another world?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Historical fiction is the only way the argument makes sense. I guess some people assume all fantasy is historical in terms of setting. Part of that could stem from a lot of fantasy series being on Earth without calling it Earth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That would make sense. Personally though, I only consider it historical if it’s listed as such.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Author Don Massenzio and commented:
Check out this great post from Charles Yallowitz that asks: Does Fantasy Have to Be Medieval?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re welcome.
LikeLike
You make some great points. I think a lot of stories that take place in outer space that are classified as Science Fiction are really more, if not completely, fantasy. I give you Star Trek vs. Star Wars. Star Trek has elements that definitely conform to some known scientific principles or theories and educates the viewer through it’s story telling methods. Star Wars is a fantasy in space. The science is made up as the story goes along and is just a background element. That’s my opinion, anyhow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think Star Wars is a hybrid. The magical element is the Force, but there’s a lot more tech-based setting. I think if the basis of action is in even fictional science then it’s sci-fi. Otherwise, we’re ignoring the second term in the genre.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Very true. I just see Star Wars as more fantasy (fiction) when it comes to the science than Star Trek which has always seemed more cerebral.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ha! You’ve pegged me. I didn’t even realize I did it, either. Yes, if a book is enough ‘medieval Europe,’ I nitpick details like time systems or available weaponry.
What successful novels DON’T take place in that imagined universe? Unless it’s a Lewis or Rowling right-under-our-noses-through-some-magic-entry world, I think medieval is what people want.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t think it’s what people want so much as them thinking it’s how the genre works. You have to avoid all aspects of medieval Europe to prevent that.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Are you sure? Anglophilia, alone, seems to push what’s really popular.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really don’t believe people notice it a lot. Since most mainstream fantasy stories use a medieval setting, they think it’s necessary like Westerns and WWII dramas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Have none of these people who do insist that ‘fantasy has to be medieval’ ever heard of urban fantasy, the sort of fantasy set in the modern (or future) world, in a large city rather than in a little town/village in fourteenth-century Normandy or wherever?
Another thing about this assumption that annoys me is thinking, since obviously all fantasy is medieval, any story with a “medieval” tech level must be fantasy… even if it was sci-fi in the previous chapter, when the protagonist and the crew of her starship got stranded on that backwater planet. Nope — now it’s fantasy, because it’s “medieval” and therefor “in the past” because of the lower (compared to what the viewwpoint character is used to) lever of the local tech.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m guessing they have, but don’t indulge. It could also be that they expect full historical accuracy when you take a medieval setting. I have seen that other mentality too. There is a weird push for science fiction that appears in an older setting be dubbed fantasy. It’s like sci-fi can only be in the future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“There is a weird push for science fiction that appears in an older setting be dubbed fantasy” … To such a ridiculous extent that some people now want to classify Arthur C. Clarke’s novel 2001: A Space Odyssey as fantasy, since it is set “in the past” for readers now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Didn’t hear about that. Wouldn’t surprise me either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I’ve seen many readers go after a fantasy book because it isn’t historically accurate.” That’s so silly, isn’t it? If we wanted to make everything historically accurate, we would not be writing fantasy. We would be writing historical fiction!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly.
LikeLike
Fantasy should be any world, any creation, limitless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fully agree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Decided to surf back through this one. You got an incredible response on it.
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Does Fantasy Have to Be Medieval? – Written By Charles Yallowitz – Writer's Treasure Chest
Fantasy is more than a genre in itself, it is first a word that encompasses imagination, creativity and something that does not really exist. We see medieval fantasy because of how history went down, europe was the first continent to have a print, to produce books in a massive scale.
But Fantasy is more than dragons and shinning armor.
I’m from Dominican Republic, we’ve been working on some settings and stories in the past couple of months that portrait a fantastical world of the natives that inhabited these lands before the spanish came and the africans that were brought as slaves after the natives were slain.
They all have magic in their mythos, they all have flesh devouring creatures, tyrant gods and mages, druids, masters of spells. Warriors, places in other realms of existence.
In other words, Fantasy is more than medieval, it’s more than a language, a place, a heritage. Fantasy is being human, is part of our imagination. The universal archetypes pur mind share just for being a human being.
Thank you for the question. We talk about it a lot down here in the caribbean.
LikeLike
Very well said. Fantasy being a genre of creating something from absolutely nothing is something I’ve called it before.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Medieval Europe is probably the default because elements of the quest are right there: sword, steed, etc.
LikeLike
True. A lot of old school fantasy takes from European mythology.
LikeLike
Pingback: Does Fantasy Have to Be Medieval? — Legends of Windemere | Fantasy/Sci-Fi FILM & WRITING FESTIVAL
Fantasy need not be unrealistic.. it can seem implausible but there should be hope.. i cant relate to dragons.. they are tooooo mythical.. i can relate to someone being invisible though and terrorising the world.. i think its a personal connection at end of the day
LikeLike
Curious. I would think fantasy is the one genre where mythical works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I definitely agree. The Fantasy world I am working on is a mix mash of cultures rather than pure medieval Europe. I think that was a trend and it’s time to pass on. Btw would really appreciate it if you could check out my blog. It’s a YA fiction book I’m working on and the blog is sorta my way of storing information. It’s an imaginative read I promise. More power to you
LikeLike
I think it’s mostly because it started with Middle Earth and that’s the type of world most readers think of. It isn’t necessarily a bad thing to use it, but making it a requirement definitely doesn’t make sense. One thing I’ve noticed is that many people will dub a non-medieval Europe fantasy as something else. Usually science fiction or plain action adventure, so the audience definitely doesn’t make it easy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yesss. I feel like this is a problem. Most people are tired of seeing the same excalibur represented in 4000 different media. Some Asiatic or Middle Eastern influences are definitely appreciated but even they may come across as too nerdy if done incorrectly.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, I don’t think a lot of people are tiring it outside of the fantasy fandom. Notice how so many are excited about at Lord of the Rings Amazon series and how the newest fantasy shows are always the same aesthetic. I don’t think enough people pay attention to fantasy for it to get a major overhaul. It’s really still a fringe genre at times. Really frustrating. Although, I use a medieval Europe setting to most extents because I made the world back in the late 90’s and things weren’t like they are today. I think . . . I really can’t tell any more since I do have castles and dragons, but I also have magi-tech, non-European weaponry, and a lot of construct monsters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah with fiction, the lines can be blurred and they probably should. The genre wont move forward unless we push it.
LikeLike
Absolutely, while I am fond of medieval fantasy. The most important thing, I would say, for a fantasy world is to have what Tolkien called ‘inner consistency’ – there should be no need for a suspension of disbelief. The world needs consistency within itself – from there, allow imagination and innovation to be your guides!
LikeLike
Consistency is certainly key. I do think fantasy always requires some level of suspension of disbelief though. Mostly to accept that dragons and magic can function. I’ve run into many who drag all of reality into a world that functions off different rules.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I concur, my point more runs along the lines that when we enter that secondary world, it must be internally consistent. We should not have to suspend disbelief inside that ‘secondary world’. It should conform it it’s own rules consistently.
LikeLike
Got it. Thanks. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post, just great. I’m a big fan of medieval culture and nothing pleases me more than just discussing or reading about it.!!!! Awesome 👍
LikeLike
Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it.
LikeLike